Shows, below, one of the most significant passages of the appeal in which list the reasons why I refused and I refuse to hold hearings under Catholic crucifixes.
"The demand for removal of crucifixes dr. Luigi Tosti.
Dr. Luigi Tosti is a magistrate who has chosen to" work "in the employ of the Vatican or the Church of the Holy Inquisition in the courts or the ecclesiastical or Rota: if he did, he could not camp the preposterous claim to remove the crosses, as he accepted, since ab initio, to work in the employ of the administration of justice confessional.
Dr. Luigi Tosti, the Instead, a citizen who, after having passed a competition in the judiciary, has agreed to work under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic "secular" e, quindi, in tribunali che non possono tollerare né manifestazioni di “libertà religiosa” da parte dello Stato, né connotazioni di “confessionalità partigiana” dell’attività giurisdizionale espletata dai giudici né, infine, imposizioni di natura religiosa alle quali non ci si possa sottrarre se non attraverso il recesso dal rapporto di lavoro.
Il dr. Luigi Tosti è anche un soggetto che, nell’esercizio del suo insindacabile diritto individuale di libertà religiosa, aborre qualsiasi forma di idolatria o di simbolismo religioso, tant’è che non espone sulla propria persona o in casa sua o nei luoghi di sua appartenenza idoli, feticci, immagini sacre o macabre reliquie as bits of skin, scabs and blood clots of Padre Pio.
So he does not and will never accept-is repeated for the second time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the third time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the fourth time, hoping that the concept is treated as such: do not accept and will never accept that the Minister of Justice requiring him to perform his work duties under the incumbency of the crucified. This taxation is in fact an act innocuous, as the innocuous act would not be a hypothetical counterpart obligation to hold hearings with a crucifix around her neck.
Dr. Tosti does not deny that the Administration and the Legislature may require the simbolismi neutrali, come ad esempio la bandiera, il ritratto del Presidente o la toga; contesta, però, che gli si possano imporre simbolismi partigiani, di natura religiosa, come i crocifissi. E se un crocifisso al collo -magari sopra la toga- connota la giurisdizione di partigianeria cattolica e lede il diritto di libertà religiosa del giudice che è obbligato ad indossarlo, un crocifisso appeso sulla parete, sopra la testa, ha gli stessi identici significati, la stessa identica valenza religiosa e gli stessi effetti pregiudizievoli sul diritto di libertà del giudice e sulle sue prerogative di imparzialità.
L’indubbia circostanza che ci si sia “assuefatti” alla visione dei crocifissi, perché risultano appesi the walls of the classrooms for nearly 90 years, no reason for erroneous conviction that the crucifix is \u200b\u200ba symbol of "passive", an "inert" does not oblige anyone to believe or to perform acts of worship, as grotesquely said by some judges.
If that were the case, you should also affirm the legitimacy of a hypothetical law imposing Italian citizens the obligation to display crucifixes in their private homes, perhaps severely punishing violators: in this "case" (which There is nothing hypothetical, considering that hundreds of mayors "sheriffs" have issued "orders" with which they have imposed the display of crucifixes in public places, imposing fines of up to 500 €) we could say that these crucifixes are symbols of "passive", the "inert" that do not require the tenants of the houses to believe or to perform acts of worship. That assessment, however, is not acceptable as it puts in clear conflict with the legal principle that the effect of Article. Rule 58 of the prison that she describes as "an act of manifestation of religious freedom," the 'display of images and symbols of their religion in their room or in their own space of belonging. "
If we consider that the choice of a faithful di esporre un crocifisso al collo ha lo stesso significato e la stessa valenza religiosa di quella di esporlo in un luogo di appartenenza (ad es. in casa o in auto), è giocoforza dedurne che, se al Ministro di Giustizia si accorda il “diritto” di imporre ai dipendenti l’obbligo di lavorare sotto l’incombenza del crocifisso, allo stesso Ministro non si potrebbe poi negare l’omologo “diritto” di obbligare i dipendenti a lavorare col crocifisso appeso al collo. Il ricorrente dubita che i dipendenti pubblici italiani siano disposti ad accettare una simile imposizione e ritiene, al contrario, che vi sarebbe un “RIFIUTO” di vaste proporzioni: il che dovrebbe indurre i raziocinanti a riflettere sull’omologo, as a "loner" "REFUSAL" which was set up by dr. Luigi Tosti.
And indeed, if the "waste" dr. Luigi Tosti stands out for its "singularity" (only the magistrate refused Tosti), this does not depend on the "singularity" of the reasons cited by him (which are otherwise endorsed by the judgments of the Supreme Court, Constitutional Court and the ECHR) but the Italians dall'assuefazione general (sorry, subjects of the Vatican) in the presence of crucifixes, since they are hanging on the walls for almost 90 years. If a judge is presented at the hearing, however, with cardinal-like clothing, that is con un vistoso crocifisso appeso al collo, il ricorrente dubita fortemente che non vi sarebbero reazioni negative, sia da parte degli utenti che da parte delle autorità preposte alla vigilanza. E allora che cosa farebbe Sua Eccellenza il Ministro di Giustizia, buon viso a cattivo gioco, oppure promuoverebbe un procedimento disciplinare contro il magistrato perché “osa” esibire al collo quello stesso crocifisso che Lui gli impone sopra la testa? Queste considerazioni dovrebbero indurre i raziocinanti a riflettere sulla questione sollevata dal “solitario” Tosti.
Riepilogando, il ricorrente ritiene che l’imposizione di lavorare in aule addobbate con crocifissi violi, in primis, il suo diritto (negativo) di libertà religiosa. Ma non è tutto.
Il dr. Luigi Tosti è infatti anche un soggetto che è “deprecabilmente” informato al rispetto e all’osservanza dei principi della Costituzione, in particolar modo di quelli “supremi”: dunque egli non accetta e non accetterà mai -si ripete per la seconda volta: non accetta e non accetterà mai, si ripete per la terza volta, acciocché il concetto sia ben recepito: non accetta e non accetterà mai che il Ministro di Giustizia/datore di lavoro lo costringa a calpestare il principio supremo di laicità, obbligandolo a connotare di partigianeria cattolica l’esercizio delle sue funzioni giurisdizionali. In uno Stato realmente “laico”, infatti, judges must administer justice in a "visibly" impartial, neutral and equidistant, and not an idol in identifying blatantly partisan as the crucifix.
Again, the principle of "secularism" stems from the fact that all citizens and all faiths "are" equal before the law (Article 3 and 8) and that, therefore, the state has an obligation to "equidistant, impartial and neutral towards all religions, in accordance with art. 8 of the Constitution, where it is in fact enshrined in the equal freedom of all religions before the law" (as most recently expressed Constitutional Court 18.4.2005 -29.4.2005 No. 168).
And if the State has an obligation not to discriminate against citizens, it is very obvious that citizens have the same subjective absolute right not to be discriminated against and to be treated with impartiality, neutrality and equidistance with respect to their beliefs or their religion. Thus, the "principle of secularism" is not a "Martian" or an invention of the Constitutional Court, but a true "legal relationship" that arises from the fact that all citizens and all faiths have equal rights and equal dignity, so that the state and all public bodies have a corresponding obligation not to discriminate against citizens and religious denominations on the basis of belief.
Well, expose a single religious symbol in the courtroom to privilege one religious denomination and the Catholic confessional connote the exercise of the judicial function, thus violating one of the fundamental precepts of the Constitution which is clearly prohibited, so much so that the Constitutional Court, with feeling. No 195/1993, said that "any discrimination on the damage of either faith and Constitutional inadmissible as it contrasts with the right to freedom of religion and the principle of equality." The
that dr. Luigi Tosti, who has sworn allegiance to the Constitution, ITALIAN, and not a monarch of a foreign state as the Pope-is absolutely intolerable.
But that's not all.
Dr. Luigi Tosti is a subject which, although not Catholic, "dares to" advancing the "claim" to have the same dignity and equal rights that his employer shall grant the "superior" race "of Catholics: he therefore , does not and will never accept-is repeated for the second time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the third time, since the concept was not the least assimilated by those who are interested in his story: Do not accepts and will never accept--is repeated for the fourth time, hoping that the concept is beginning to be treated as such: do not accept and will never accept that the Minister of Justice, after having imposed the obligation to work under the incumbency of crucifixes Catholic, denies the equal right to display their symbols, ie it discriminates in a direct and blatant in the work environment on account of his religious beliefs.
It is emphasized that the dr. Tosti has expressed his utter willingness to hold hearings under the incumbency of the crucified, as long as was permitted to display their symbols, that is not being trampled on because of his right to manifest and propagate his beliefs. So, if there is a responsibility for the failure of hearings held, this is not Tosti, but the Administration "Racist" that prevented him from exposing its symbols, trampling and raping the following laws:
- art. 3 of the Constitution, which states that "all citizens, then the Jews and atheists," they have the same dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of religion ";
- art. 8 of the Constitution, which states that "all religions-Judaism and atheism, and therefore, are equally free before the law";
- art. 19 of the Constitution, which states that "all-and then the Jews, and atheists have the right to profess freely their religion, to propagate it and to worship in public;
- art. 9 of the International Convention on Human Rights, which states that "every person-and therefore also the jew-el'ateo has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this matter right the freedom to change religion or thought, as well as the freedom to manifest one's religion or their thoughts individually or collectively, in public or in private, through worship, teaching, practice and performance of rituals;
- art. 14 of the Convention, entitled "Prohibition of discrimination", which states that "the enjoyment of rights civili e delle libertà riconosciuti nella presente Convenzione deve essere garantito a tutti -quindi anche agli ebrei e agli atei- senza alcuna distinzione, fondata sulla... religione”;
- l’art. 43 del D. L.vo n. 286/1998, titolato “Discriminazione per motivi razziali, etnici, nazionali o religiosi”, che sanziona come atto discriminatorio “ogni comportamento che, direttamente o indirettamente, comporti una distinzione, esclusione, restrizione o preferenza basata sulle........ convinzioni e pratiche religiose” e stabilisce che “compie un atto di discriminazione... il pubblico ufficiale ..... che nell’esercizio delle sue funzioni compia od ometta atti nei riguardi di un cittadino.... che, soltanto because of his condition ....... of belonging to a given ..... the religion unfairly discriminate "and" the employer who ....... any action or behavior that would produce an adverse effect discrimination, even indirectly, the workers because they belong to a religious confession ............. "
- art. 43 of Legislative Decree 286/1998, which stipulates that "When the behavior ....... public administration makes discrimination on grounds ..... religious, the court may ......... order the cessation of the injurious behavior and take any other measure under the circumstances, to remove the effects of discrimination ";
- the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, signed at Strasbourg on 1 February 1995 and ratified by Act Aug. 28, 1997, No 302, which states in Article. 6 that "The Parties shall encourage a spirit of tolerance and intercultural dialogue and take effective measures to promote respect and mutual understanding and cooperation among all persons living on their territory, irrespective of their identity .. religious .... ....... and undertake to take all appropriate measures to protect people who may be victims ..... acts of discrimination ...... religious;
- art. 2, Part I ^, of L. 03/08/1989 No 101, which states that "in accordance with the principles of the Constitution, is entitled to freely profess and practice the Jewish religion in any form, individually or in combination, and to disseminate it in private or in public worship and rituals," which "is assured penally equal protection of religious feelings and rights of religious freedom, without discrimination between citizens and between faiths;
- Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, which enshrines the "right to equality before the law "and that" protection against discrimination constitutes a universal right recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, United Nations Covenants on Civil and Political Rights respectively Rights and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the European Convention for the Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms to which all Member States are signatories. " The directive also provides that "discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation may undermine the achievement of the objectives of the EC Treaty, in particular the attainment of a high level of employment and social protection, the raising of standards and quality della vita, la coesione economica e sociale, la solidarietà e la libera circolazione delle persone”;
- l’art. 2 del D. Lgs. n. 216/2003, che sanziona qualsiasi forma di “discriminazione” da parte del datore di lavoro pubblico o privato, e cioè sia la “discriminazione diretta” (“quando, per religione...... una persona è trattata meno favorevolmente di quanto sia, sia stata o sarebbe trattata un'altra in una situazione analoga”) che quella “indiretta” (“quando una disposizione, un criterio, una prassi, un atto, un patto o un comportamento apparentemente neutri possono mettere le persone che professano una determinata religione ...... in una situazione particular disadvantage compared with other persons ");
- finally the art. Act 3 of 13.10.1975, which punishes with imprisonment for "those who commit acts of discrimination on religious grounds ...."
Fourth, and finally, finally, the dr. Tosti is a person informed and inspired the respect of fundamental human rights, respect for the Republican Constitution, the fundamental principles that govern modern democratic states, the respect of criminal laws and those compelling and, last but not least, respect of his "brain" and its ability to be logical and critical thinking. Therefore, as the Italian state would not tolerate the crime requires the Nazi swastika, that is the standard of those Christians criminals under the command of a criminal named Catholic Adolf Hitler have become architects of racial persecution and genocide of six million Jews, Roma and homosexuals, a fortiori can not tolerate Minister of Justice to impose a symbol that is infinitely more criminal than the swastika, that is the banner of a band of criminals and counterfeiters who has become artisans in about 1,700 years of history of nefarious, heinous of crimes against humanity, causing the extermination of hundreds of millions of human beings, and not "just" 6 million innocent people. The cross-complacent in spite of attempts to smuggle and outrageous as "the simbolo storico/culturale che identifica il popolo italiano e che esprime un sistema di valori di libertà, di eguaglianza, di dignità umana e di tolleranza religiosa, che stanno alla base del principio di laicità dello Stato”- rappresenta il “vessillo” della più grande banda di criminali e della più grande banda di falsari che sia mai esistita sul pianeta Terra, la quale si è resa artefice dei più efferati crimini contro l’umanità, condividendoli di papa in papa senza il minimo moto di resipiscenza o di pentimento.
La storia del “crocifisso” gronda di sangue, di genocidi, di assassini, di torture, di criminale inquisizione, di criminali crociate, di criminale razzismo, of criminal sentencing to death of heretics, criminals convicted of arson and torture of hundreds of thousands of witches, a global criminal enslavement of indigenous peoples, superstition, discrimination and criminal prosecution racial, criminal Shoah, in collaboration with criminal Ustasha genocide, crime of providing false passports and foreign travel and aid to allow the escape of Nazi war criminals, of criminal kidnapping of Jewish children because "baptized" in secret, the castration of children to raise celestial melodies "to" good "God of Hosts, of criminal genocide of Native Americans and Australian criminal confiscation, di patologica misoginia ed omofobia, di discriminazione delle donne e degli omosessuali, di patologica sessuofobia, di intolleranza, di oscurantismo, di negazione assoluta dei più elementari diritti politici ed umani di eguaglianza, di libertà di opinione, di libertà di pensiero, di libertà di religione e di libertà di scienza e ricerca, di omertosa e criminale copertura dei preti pedofili a livello planetario, di omertosa e criminale copertura di assassini e di occultamento di cadaveri nei sottotetti delle Chiese, di mafiose connivenze e scambi di favori economici con politici e “gentiluomini” del Papa per ottenere i finanziamenti dei grandi eventi, di omertosa e criminale complicità nel riciclaggio del danaro sporco e in processing tax, the imposition of unnatural practices such as chastity, criminal incitement to murder by prohibiting the use of condoms for AIDS patients, non-adherence to international conventions concluded by the Member for the Protection of Civil Rights and fundamental freedoms of men and women, failure to adhere to international conventions aimed at combating crime, money laundering and tax evasion, of financial impropriety parasitic accumulation of enormous wealth that represent a scandal "theological" and an insult to poverty, ostentation of pomp, gold, precious stones, wealth, liturgical vestments and shoes of Prada outrage that the real poor "Christs" of this planet, "financial havens" created and managed to hide the tracing of criminals and facilitate banking transactions, the absolute denial of political rights and religious freedom, absolute denial of the inviolable right of marriage of priests and nuns, of fraud, of constant abuse of popular credulity for speculative purposes, to put fraudulent Gregorian, of simony, the commercialization of indulgences, of fraudulent marketing of "medals" miracle "of Madonna and other inferior gods, a miracle of marketing fraudulent monoxide dihydrogen of the prestigious pharmaceutical laboratories of Lourdes, mafia bubbles composing, the nativity of Jesus Christ of false, false "donations" of Constantine to "justify" the Church's temporal power on planet Earth, a constant falsification of the sacred writings and tarot, of false relics, false foreskins of Jesus (at least 13!) of fake blood of Jesus Christ, to false "bands" of the child Jesus, the manger of the ox and donkey false, false cradles baby Jesus, false bottle of baby Jesus, of false and fraudulent "the blood of San Gennaro", false feathers of the wings of the Archangel Gabriel, false veils of the Virgin Mary of false hair, madonna, the breaker of the Madonna, fake engagement rings of Joseph and Mary, false sticks and belts of St. Joseph, fake "milk" of the Virgin Mary, crown of thorns of false, false "heads" off of St. John the Baptist, Judas' false money-bags-of false with relative skull, brain, vertebrae, clavicles, fingers, feet, hands, hips and other grisly human remains, belonging to those who know and those attributed to false Saints , false apparitions of the Virgin Mary-a thousand, but not in a Muslim country-of false Madonnas that weep blood, a plethora of fake hosts that are transformed miraculously Florentine blood, false case of Our Lady of Loreto -That flit to the delight of the Italian pilots of false-nails of the cross of Jesus, the cross of Jesus false, false Lance of Longinus (Heilige Lanze) venerated by the villain Catholic Hitler, shrouds false, false Veronica, false miracles, false saints-authors of false miracles, false exorcists practicing shamanic rituals for the mentally ill or accomplices impostors, false stigmata of false transubstantiation of the Host, the Holy Fathers of the Pious frauds, false Purgatorio, limbic false, false demons, angels, false, false archangels, cherubim, false, false seraphim, thrones of false, false possessed, and even the cunning "shitting" donkey that would carry Jesus Christ. Exposing
crucifixes in courtrooms is therefore not only an insult to the supreme principle of secularism and human intelligence, but is also an insult and an affront to legality, justice, civilization and the memory of the hundreds of millions of human beings humans in the name of that macabre and horrific symbol, have been murdered, tortured, gutted, imprisoned, discriminated against, indicted, ghettoized, prevaricate, duped, swindled, vilified and marginalized by the Catholic Church in his nefarious criminal history. The applicant considers that there is a symbol that is more "disqualified" and more unworthy of being exposed in court of the crucifix.
The applicant considers shameful and unacceptable that this exposes the Italian flagship in the court, as is shameful, outrageous and intolerable that the Pope and the church hierarchy seguitino still to be accredited, sponsored and backed by the Italian institutions, despite of the criminal past of the Church and in spite of their present, far from commendable. The applicant is shameful that the church hierarchy invade everyday Italian politics, public spaces and RAI with intrusive interventions that brutalize the principle of secularism and religious pluralism and are called to be present in first-line and in perfect "solitude" - opening of the Italian judiciary, which is before the Supreme Court before the Court of Appeals, as if the judiciary is subject to constitutional provisions, the sovereignty of the Church.
Dr. Luigi Tosti is a magistrate who has chosen to" work "in the employ of the Vatican or the Church of the Holy Inquisition in the courts or the ecclesiastical or Rota: if he did, he could not camp the preposterous claim to remove the crosses, as he accepted, since ab initio, to work in the employ of the administration of justice confessional.
Dr. Luigi Tosti, the Instead, a citizen who, after having passed a competition in the judiciary, has agreed to work under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic "secular" e, quindi, in tribunali che non possono tollerare né manifestazioni di “libertà religiosa” da parte dello Stato, né connotazioni di “confessionalità partigiana” dell’attività giurisdizionale espletata dai giudici né, infine, imposizioni di natura religiosa alle quali non ci si possa sottrarre se non attraverso il recesso dal rapporto di lavoro.
Il dr. Luigi Tosti è anche un soggetto che, nell’esercizio del suo insindacabile diritto individuale di libertà religiosa, aborre qualsiasi forma di idolatria o di simbolismo religioso, tant’è che non espone sulla propria persona o in casa sua o nei luoghi di sua appartenenza idoli, feticci, immagini sacre o macabre reliquie as bits of skin, scabs and blood clots of Padre Pio.
So he does not and will never accept-is repeated for the second time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the third time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the fourth time, hoping that the concept is treated as such: do not accept and will never accept that the Minister of Justice requiring him to perform his work duties under the incumbency of the crucified. This taxation is in fact an act innocuous, as the innocuous act would not be a hypothetical counterpart obligation to hold hearings with a crucifix around her neck.
Dr. Tosti does not deny that the Administration and the Legislature may require the simbolismi neutrali, come ad esempio la bandiera, il ritratto del Presidente o la toga; contesta, però, che gli si possano imporre simbolismi partigiani, di natura religiosa, come i crocifissi. E se un crocifisso al collo -magari sopra la toga- connota la giurisdizione di partigianeria cattolica e lede il diritto di libertà religiosa del giudice che è obbligato ad indossarlo, un crocifisso appeso sulla parete, sopra la testa, ha gli stessi identici significati, la stessa identica valenza religiosa e gli stessi effetti pregiudizievoli sul diritto di libertà del giudice e sulle sue prerogative di imparzialità.
L’indubbia circostanza che ci si sia “assuefatti” alla visione dei crocifissi, perché risultano appesi the walls of the classrooms for nearly 90 years, no reason for erroneous conviction that the crucifix is \u200b\u200ba symbol of "passive", an "inert" does not oblige anyone to believe or to perform acts of worship, as grotesquely said by some judges.
If that were the case, you should also affirm the legitimacy of a hypothetical law imposing Italian citizens the obligation to display crucifixes in their private homes, perhaps severely punishing violators: in this "case" (which There is nothing hypothetical, considering that hundreds of mayors "sheriffs" have issued "orders" with which they have imposed the display of crucifixes in public places, imposing fines of up to 500 €) we could say that these crucifixes are symbols of "passive", the "inert" that do not require the tenants of the houses to believe or to perform acts of worship. That assessment, however, is not acceptable as it puts in clear conflict with the legal principle that the effect of Article. Rule 58 of the prison that she describes as "an act of manifestation of religious freedom," the 'display of images and symbols of their religion in their room or in their own space of belonging. "
If we consider that the choice of a faithful di esporre un crocifisso al collo ha lo stesso significato e la stessa valenza religiosa di quella di esporlo in un luogo di appartenenza (ad es. in casa o in auto), è giocoforza dedurne che, se al Ministro di Giustizia si accorda il “diritto” di imporre ai dipendenti l’obbligo di lavorare sotto l’incombenza del crocifisso, allo stesso Ministro non si potrebbe poi negare l’omologo “diritto” di obbligare i dipendenti a lavorare col crocifisso appeso al collo. Il ricorrente dubita che i dipendenti pubblici italiani siano disposti ad accettare una simile imposizione e ritiene, al contrario, che vi sarebbe un “RIFIUTO” di vaste proporzioni: il che dovrebbe indurre i raziocinanti a riflettere sull’omologo, as a "loner" "REFUSAL" which was set up by dr. Luigi Tosti.
And indeed, if the "waste" dr. Luigi Tosti stands out for its "singularity" (only the magistrate refused Tosti), this does not depend on the "singularity" of the reasons cited by him (which are otherwise endorsed by the judgments of the Supreme Court, Constitutional Court and the ECHR) but the Italians dall'assuefazione general (sorry, subjects of the Vatican) in the presence of crucifixes, since they are hanging on the walls for almost 90 years. If a judge is presented at the hearing, however, with cardinal-like clothing, that is con un vistoso crocifisso appeso al collo, il ricorrente dubita fortemente che non vi sarebbero reazioni negative, sia da parte degli utenti che da parte delle autorità preposte alla vigilanza. E allora che cosa farebbe Sua Eccellenza il Ministro di Giustizia, buon viso a cattivo gioco, oppure promuoverebbe un procedimento disciplinare contro il magistrato perché “osa” esibire al collo quello stesso crocifisso che Lui gli impone sopra la testa? Queste considerazioni dovrebbero indurre i raziocinanti a riflettere sulla questione sollevata dal “solitario” Tosti.
Riepilogando, il ricorrente ritiene che l’imposizione di lavorare in aule addobbate con crocifissi violi, in primis, il suo diritto (negativo) di libertà religiosa. Ma non è tutto.
Il dr. Luigi Tosti è infatti anche un soggetto che è “deprecabilmente” informato al rispetto e all’osservanza dei principi della Costituzione, in particolar modo di quelli “supremi”: dunque egli non accetta e non accetterà mai -si ripete per la seconda volta: non accetta e non accetterà mai, si ripete per la terza volta, acciocché il concetto sia ben recepito: non accetta e non accetterà mai che il Ministro di Giustizia/datore di lavoro lo costringa a calpestare il principio supremo di laicità, obbligandolo a connotare di partigianeria cattolica l’esercizio delle sue funzioni giurisdizionali. In uno Stato realmente “laico”, infatti, judges must administer justice in a "visibly" impartial, neutral and equidistant, and not an idol in identifying blatantly partisan as the crucifix.
Again, the principle of "secularism" stems from the fact that all citizens and all faiths "are" equal before the law (Article 3 and 8) and that, therefore, the state has an obligation to "equidistant, impartial and neutral towards all religions, in accordance with art. 8 of the Constitution, where it is in fact enshrined in the equal freedom of all religions before the law" (as most recently expressed Constitutional Court 18.4.2005 -29.4.2005 No. 168).
And if the State has an obligation not to discriminate against citizens, it is very obvious that citizens have the same subjective absolute right not to be discriminated against and to be treated with impartiality, neutrality and equidistance with respect to their beliefs or their religion. Thus, the "principle of secularism" is not a "Martian" or an invention of the Constitutional Court, but a true "legal relationship" that arises from the fact that all citizens and all faiths have equal rights and equal dignity, so that the state and all public bodies have a corresponding obligation not to discriminate against citizens and religious denominations on the basis of belief.
Well, expose a single religious symbol in the courtroom to privilege one religious denomination and the Catholic confessional connote the exercise of the judicial function, thus violating one of the fundamental precepts of the Constitution which is clearly prohibited, so much so that the Constitutional Court, with feeling. No 195/1993, said that "any discrimination on the damage of either faith and Constitutional inadmissible as it contrasts with the right to freedom of religion and the principle of equality." The
that dr. Luigi Tosti, who has sworn allegiance to the Constitution, ITALIAN, and not a monarch of a foreign state as the Pope-is absolutely intolerable.
But that's not all.
Dr. Luigi Tosti is a subject which, although not Catholic, "dares to" advancing the "claim" to have the same dignity and equal rights that his employer shall grant the "superior" race "of Catholics: he therefore , does not and will never accept-is repeated for the second time, does not and will never accept--is repeated for the third time, since the concept was not the least assimilated by those who are interested in his story: Do not accepts and will never accept--is repeated for the fourth time, hoping that the concept is beginning to be treated as such: do not accept and will never accept that the Minister of Justice, after having imposed the obligation to work under the incumbency of crucifixes Catholic, denies the equal right to display their symbols, ie it discriminates in a direct and blatant in the work environment on account of his religious beliefs.
It is emphasized that the dr. Tosti has expressed his utter willingness to hold hearings under the incumbency of the crucified, as long as was permitted to display their symbols, that is not being trampled on because of his right to manifest and propagate his beliefs. So, if there is a responsibility for the failure of hearings held, this is not Tosti, but the Administration "Racist" that prevented him from exposing its symbols, trampling and raping the following laws:
- art. 3 of the Constitution, which states that "all citizens, then the Jews and atheists," they have the same dignity and are equal before the law, without distinction of religion ";
- art. 8 of the Constitution, which states that "all religions-Judaism and atheism, and therefore, are equally free before the law";
- art. 19 of the Constitution, which states that "all-and then the Jews, and atheists have the right to profess freely their religion, to propagate it and to worship in public;
- art. 9 of the International Convention on Human Rights, which states that "every person-and therefore also the jew-el'ateo has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this matter right the freedom to change religion or thought, as well as the freedom to manifest one's religion or their thoughts individually or collectively, in public or in private, through worship, teaching, practice and performance of rituals;
- art. 14 of the Convention, entitled "Prohibition of discrimination", which states that "the enjoyment of rights civili e delle libertà riconosciuti nella presente Convenzione deve essere garantito a tutti -quindi anche agli ebrei e agli atei- senza alcuna distinzione, fondata sulla... religione”;
- l’art. 43 del D. L.vo n. 286/1998, titolato “Discriminazione per motivi razziali, etnici, nazionali o religiosi”, che sanziona come atto discriminatorio “ogni comportamento che, direttamente o indirettamente, comporti una distinzione, esclusione, restrizione o preferenza basata sulle........ convinzioni e pratiche religiose” e stabilisce che “compie un atto di discriminazione... il pubblico ufficiale ..... che nell’esercizio delle sue funzioni compia od ometta atti nei riguardi di un cittadino.... che, soltanto because of his condition ....... of belonging to a given ..... the religion unfairly discriminate "and" the employer who ....... any action or behavior that would produce an adverse effect discrimination, even indirectly, the workers because they belong to a religious confession ............. "
- art. 43 of Legislative Decree 286/1998, which stipulates that "When the behavior ....... public administration makes discrimination on grounds ..... religious, the court may ......... order the cessation of the injurious behavior and take any other measure under the circumstances, to remove the effects of discrimination ";
- the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, signed at Strasbourg on 1 February 1995 and ratified by Act Aug. 28, 1997, No 302, which states in Article. 6 that "The Parties shall encourage a spirit of tolerance and intercultural dialogue and take effective measures to promote respect and mutual understanding and cooperation among all persons living on their territory, irrespective of their identity .. religious .... ....... and undertake to take all appropriate measures to protect people who may be victims ..... acts of discrimination ...... religious;
- art. 2, Part I ^, of L. 03/08/1989 No 101, which states that "in accordance with the principles of the Constitution, is entitled to freely profess and practice the Jewish religion in any form, individually or in combination, and to disseminate it in private or in public worship and rituals," which "is assured penally equal protection of religious feelings and rights of religious freedom, without discrimination between citizens and between faiths;
- Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000, which enshrines the "right to equality before the law "and that" protection against discrimination constitutes a universal right recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, United Nations Covenants on Civil and Political Rights respectively Rights and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the European Convention for the Protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms to which all Member States are signatories. " The directive also provides that "discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation may undermine the achievement of the objectives of the EC Treaty, in particular the attainment of a high level of employment and social protection, the raising of standards and quality della vita, la coesione economica e sociale, la solidarietà e la libera circolazione delle persone”;
- l’art. 2 del D. Lgs. n. 216/2003, che sanziona qualsiasi forma di “discriminazione” da parte del datore di lavoro pubblico o privato, e cioè sia la “discriminazione diretta” (“quando, per religione...... una persona è trattata meno favorevolmente di quanto sia, sia stata o sarebbe trattata un'altra in una situazione analoga”) che quella “indiretta” (“quando una disposizione, un criterio, una prassi, un atto, un patto o un comportamento apparentemente neutri possono mettere le persone che professano una determinata religione ...... in una situazione particular disadvantage compared with other persons ");
- finally the art. Act 3 of 13.10.1975, which punishes with imprisonment for "those who commit acts of discrimination on religious grounds ...."
Fourth, and finally, finally, the dr. Tosti is a person informed and inspired the respect of fundamental human rights, respect for the Republican Constitution, the fundamental principles that govern modern democratic states, the respect of criminal laws and those compelling and, last but not least, respect of his "brain" and its ability to be logical and critical thinking. Therefore, as the Italian state would not tolerate the crime requires the Nazi swastika, that is the standard of those Christians criminals under the command of a criminal named Catholic Adolf Hitler have become architects of racial persecution and genocide of six million Jews, Roma and homosexuals, a fortiori can not tolerate Minister of Justice to impose a symbol that is infinitely more criminal than the swastika, that is the banner of a band of criminals and counterfeiters who has become artisans in about 1,700 years of history of nefarious, heinous of crimes against humanity, causing the extermination of hundreds of millions of human beings, and not "just" 6 million innocent people. The cross-complacent in spite of attempts to smuggle and outrageous as "the simbolo storico/culturale che identifica il popolo italiano e che esprime un sistema di valori di libertà, di eguaglianza, di dignità umana e di tolleranza religiosa, che stanno alla base del principio di laicità dello Stato”- rappresenta il “vessillo” della più grande banda di criminali e della più grande banda di falsari che sia mai esistita sul pianeta Terra, la quale si è resa artefice dei più efferati crimini contro l’umanità, condividendoli di papa in papa senza il minimo moto di resipiscenza o di pentimento.
La storia del “crocifisso” gronda di sangue, di genocidi, di assassini, di torture, di criminale inquisizione, di criminali crociate, di criminale razzismo, of criminal sentencing to death of heretics, criminals convicted of arson and torture of hundreds of thousands of witches, a global criminal enslavement of indigenous peoples, superstition, discrimination and criminal prosecution racial, criminal Shoah, in collaboration with criminal Ustasha genocide, crime of providing false passports and foreign travel and aid to allow the escape of Nazi war criminals, of criminal kidnapping of Jewish children because "baptized" in secret, the castration of children to raise celestial melodies "to" good "God of Hosts, of criminal genocide of Native Americans and Australian criminal confiscation, di patologica misoginia ed omofobia, di discriminazione delle donne e degli omosessuali, di patologica sessuofobia, di intolleranza, di oscurantismo, di negazione assoluta dei più elementari diritti politici ed umani di eguaglianza, di libertà di opinione, di libertà di pensiero, di libertà di religione e di libertà di scienza e ricerca, di omertosa e criminale copertura dei preti pedofili a livello planetario, di omertosa e criminale copertura di assassini e di occultamento di cadaveri nei sottotetti delle Chiese, di mafiose connivenze e scambi di favori economici con politici e “gentiluomini” del Papa per ottenere i finanziamenti dei grandi eventi, di omertosa e criminale complicità nel riciclaggio del danaro sporco e in processing tax, the imposition of unnatural practices such as chastity, criminal incitement to murder by prohibiting the use of condoms for AIDS patients, non-adherence to international conventions concluded by the Member for the Protection of Civil Rights and fundamental freedoms of men and women, failure to adhere to international conventions aimed at combating crime, money laundering and tax evasion, of financial impropriety parasitic accumulation of enormous wealth that represent a scandal "theological" and an insult to poverty, ostentation of pomp, gold, precious stones, wealth, liturgical vestments and shoes of Prada outrage that the real poor "Christs" of this planet, "financial havens" created and managed to hide the tracing of criminals and facilitate banking transactions, the absolute denial of political rights and religious freedom, absolute denial of the inviolable right of marriage of priests and nuns, of fraud, of constant abuse of popular credulity for speculative purposes, to put fraudulent Gregorian, of simony, the commercialization of indulgences, of fraudulent marketing of "medals" miracle "of Madonna and other inferior gods, a miracle of marketing fraudulent monoxide dihydrogen of the prestigious pharmaceutical laboratories of Lourdes, mafia bubbles composing, the nativity of Jesus Christ of false, false "donations" of Constantine to "justify" the Church's temporal power on planet Earth, a constant falsification of the sacred writings and tarot, of false relics, false foreskins of Jesus (at least 13!) of fake blood of Jesus Christ, to false "bands" of the child Jesus, the manger of the ox and donkey false, false cradles baby Jesus, false bottle of baby Jesus, of false and fraudulent "the blood of San Gennaro", false feathers of the wings of the Archangel Gabriel, false veils of the Virgin Mary of false hair, madonna, the breaker of the Madonna, fake engagement rings of Joseph and Mary, false sticks and belts of St. Joseph, fake "milk" of the Virgin Mary, crown of thorns of false, false "heads" off of St. John the Baptist, Judas' false money-bags-of false with relative skull, brain, vertebrae, clavicles, fingers, feet, hands, hips and other grisly human remains, belonging to those who know and those attributed to false Saints , false apparitions of the Virgin Mary-a thousand, but not in a Muslim country-of false Madonnas that weep blood, a plethora of fake hosts that are transformed miraculously Florentine blood, false case of Our Lady of Loreto -That flit to the delight of the Italian pilots of false-nails of the cross of Jesus, the cross of Jesus false, false Lance of Longinus (Heilige Lanze) venerated by the villain Catholic Hitler, shrouds false, false Veronica, false miracles, false saints-authors of false miracles, false exorcists practicing shamanic rituals for the mentally ill or accomplices impostors, false stigmata of false transubstantiation of the Host, the Holy Fathers of the Pious frauds, false Purgatorio, limbic false, false demons, angels, false, false archangels, cherubim, false, false seraphim, thrones of false, false possessed, and even the cunning "shitting" donkey that would carry Jesus Christ. Exposing
crucifixes in courtrooms is therefore not only an insult to the supreme principle of secularism and human intelligence, but is also an insult and an affront to legality, justice, civilization and the memory of the hundreds of millions of human beings humans in the name of that macabre and horrific symbol, have been murdered, tortured, gutted, imprisoned, discriminated against, indicted, ghettoized, prevaricate, duped, swindled, vilified and marginalized by the Catholic Church in his nefarious criminal history. The applicant considers that there is a symbol that is more "disqualified" and more unworthy of being exposed in court of the crucifix.
The applicant considers shameful and unacceptable that this exposes the Italian flagship in the court, as is shameful, outrageous and intolerable that the Pope and the church hierarchy seguitino still to be accredited, sponsored and backed by the Italian institutions, despite of the criminal past of the Church and in spite of their present, far from commendable. The applicant is shameful that the church hierarchy invade everyday Italian politics, public spaces and RAI with intrusive interventions that brutalize the principle of secularism and religious pluralism and are called to be present in first-line and in perfect "solitude" - opening of the Italian judiciary, which is before the Supreme Court before the Court of Appeals, as if the judiciary is subject to constitutional provisions, the sovereignty of the Church.
Source:
0 comments:
Post a Comment